Nutrient vs. IronPDF: Complete comparison for .NET developers

Table of contents

    Nutrient vs. IronPDF: Complete comparison for .NET developers
    TL;DR

    Both libraries offer HTML-to-PDF conversion with Chrome-based rendering, plus basic PDF manipulation (editing, text extraction, forms, signatures, merge and split, and PDF/A compliance).

    Nutrient .NET SDK goes further with built-in OCR (125+ languages), ML-powered data extraction from invoices and forms, 100+ format support, scanner integration, and barcode processing — consolidating what would typically require 3–5 separate libraries.

    Pick IronPDF if HTML-to-PDF conversion and basic PDF manipulation cover your needs. Pick Nutrient if you also need OCR, ML-powered data extraction, multi-format support, scanning, or barcodes.

    Try Nutrient free →

    Key differences at a glance

    Scope

    IronPDF: HTML-to-PDF conversion and basic manipulation

    Nutrient: Complete document lifecycle (create, read, modify, extract, convert)

    Data extraction

    IronPDF: None

    Nutrient: Built-in ML-powered extraction for forms, tables, and key-value pairs

    Format support

    IronPDF: PDF only

    Nutrient: 100+ formats, including Office, images, CAD, and DICOM

    Direct feature comparison

    FeatureNutrient .NET SDKIronPDF
    PDF generation✅ Full support✅ Primary focus (HTML-to-PDF)
    HTML-to-PDF rendering✅ Chrome-based rendering with full CSS and media support✅ Chrome-based rendering with full CSS and media support
    PDF editing✅ Add and remove content, annotations, stamps, and watermarks✅ Headers, footers, and watermarks
    Text extractionAdvanced extraction✅ Basic text extraction
    OCR✅ Built in, 125+ languages, advanced pre- and post-processing⚠️ Via IronOCR (separate product, 125+ languages)
    Form processing✅ Create, fill, and flatten✅ Fill and flatten forms
    Digital signatures✅ Certificates and timestamps✅ Digital signatures and encryption
    Document operations✅ Merge and split✅ Merge and split
    ML-powered data extraction✅ Key-value pairs and tables❌ Not supported
    Format support✅ 100+ formats❌ PDF only
    PDF/A compliance✅ PDF/A-1 through PDF/A-4 (92.1 percent conformance rate)✅ PDF/A-1 through PDF/A-4 (41.1 percent conformance rate)
    PDF/UA accessibility✅ Full compliance, autotagging, and conversion✅ Basic support (no autotagging)
    Barcode generation and reading✅ Generate and read 1D and 2D❌ Not built in
    Image preprocessing✅ Deskew, denoise, and remove noise, lines, and punch holes⚠️ Basic preprocessing via IronOCR (separate product)
    Document scanning✅ TWAIN and WIA scanner support❌ Not supported
    OMR (optical mark recognition)✅ Extract checkboxes and bubbles❌ Not supported
    MRZ extraction✅ Passports, IDs, visas, and driver’s licenses❌ Not supported
    Hyper-compression✅ MRC compression for scanned documents❌ Not supported
    Desktop PDF viewer✅ WinForms and WPF viewer with search and bookmarks❌ Not applicable
    Cross-platform✅ Windows, Linux, macOS (.NET 6, 7, 8, and Framework 4.6.2)✅ Windows, Docker (Linux only)
    Large document handling✅ Optimized for large files⚠️ Potential overhead with large or JS-intensive HTML
    CommunityCommercial support with SLACommercial support with documentation
    LicensingCommercialCommercial (perpetual and subscription options)
    PricingContact for quoteStarts around $750 or more (varies by team size and project scope)

    Advanced AI extraction — For LLM-powered natural language extraction and document classification, Nutrient offers the AI Document Processing SDK as a separate product with its own license. This adds advanced capabilities like intelligent invoice processing with ML templates and confidence scores.

    Testing document features? Try Nutrient with your actual documents to test OCR, extraction, and format support.

    Nutrient vs. IronPDF: Code example comparisons

    Compare how IronPDF and Nutrient handle four common PDF workflows: HTML conversion, text extraction, OCR processing, and merging documents.

    Example 1 — Generate a PDF from HTML

    IronPDF approach

    using IronPdf;
    // Create a PDF from an HTML string.
    var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
    var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf("<h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p>");
    // Save the PDF to a file.
    pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
    // Or render from a URL.
    var urlPdf = renderer.RenderUrlAsPdf("https://example.com");
    urlPdf.SaveAs("webpage.pdf");

    IronPDF renders HTML to PDF using its Chrome-based engine. The renderer handles CSS, JavaScript, and responsive layouts.

    Nutrient .NET SDK approach (HTML-to-PDF)

    using GdPictureDocumentConverter gdpictureDocumentConverter = new GdPictureDocumentConverter();
    // Option 1: Convert from HTML file.
    gdpictureDocumentConverter.LoadFromFile(@"C:\temp\source.html", GdPicture14.DocumentFormat.DocumentFormatHTML);
    gdpictureDocumentConverter.SaveAsPDF(@"C:\temp\output.pdf");
    // Option 2: Convert from URL with Chrome rendering.
    GdPictureDocumentUtilities.SetWebBrowserPath(@"C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe");
    gdpictureDocumentConverter.LoadFromHttp(new Uri("https://www.nutrient.io/"), GdPicture14.DocumentFormat.DocumentFormatHTML);
    gdpictureDocumentConverter.SaveAsPDF(@"C:\temp\webpage.pdf");

    Nutrient’s GdPictureDocumentConverter loads HTML from files or URLs, and then converts to PDF using Chrome-based rendering (configured via SetWebBrowserPath). The same SDK also provides OCR, format conversion, and compliance features.

    Example 2 — Extract text from an existing PDF

    IronPDF approach

    using IronPdf;
    // Load an existing PDF document.
    var pdf = PdfDocument.FromFile("document.pdf");
    // Extract all text from the PDF.
    string text = pdf.ExtractAllText();
    // Save the extracted text to a file.
    File.WriteAllText("extracted.txt", text);
    // Extract text from a specific page.
    string pageText = pdf.ExtractTextFromPage(0); // First page (0-indexed)

    IronPDF loads the PDF and uses ExtractAllText() for all text or ExtractTextFromPage() for specific pages.

    Nutrient .NET SDK approach

    using GdPicturePDF gdpicturePDF = new GdPicturePDF();
    // Load the source document.
    gdpicturePDF.LoadFromFile("input.pdf");
    // Select the first page.
    gdpicturePDF.SelectPage(1);
    // Extract the text from the page.
    string extractedText= gdpicturePDF.GetPageText();
    // Save the extracted text to a file.
    File.WriteAllText("ExtractedText.txt", extractedText);

    Nutrient loads the PDF with LoadFromFile(), and then loops through each page to extract text using GetPageText(). The optional SetTextExtractionOptions() improves word boundary detection in structured documents.

    Example 3 — Perform OCR on a scanned PDF

    Nutrient includes built-in OCR with advanced pre- and post-processing. IronPDF requires a separate product (IronOCR) for OCR.

    IronPDF approach

    using IronPdf;
    using IronOcr;
    // Note: IronOCR is a separate product from Iron Software.
    // Load the scanned PDF.
    var pdf = PdfDocument.FromFile("scanned.pdf");
    // Create an OCR object.
    var ocr = new IronTesseract();
    // Use IronOCR to read the first page.
    using var input = new OcrInput();
    input.LoadPdf("scanned.pdf", 0); // First page
    var result = ocr.Read(input);
    // Get the text.
    string extractedText = result.Text;

    The code loads a PDF and then uses IronOCR (a separate product) to perform OCR on the first page. IronOCR supports 125+ languages with basic image preprocessing. You need both IronPDF and IronOCR licenses for this workflow.

    Nutrient .NET SDK approach

    using GdPicturePDF gdpicturePDF = new GdPicturePDF();
    // Load the source document.
    gdpicturePDF.LoadFromFile("input.pdf");
    // Run the OCR process on all pages with maximum multithreading support.
    gdpicturePDF.OcrPages("*", 0, "eng", "", "", 300);
    // Save the result in a PDF document.
    gdpicturePDF.SaveToFile(@"C:\temp\output.pdf");

    Nutrient loads the PDF and runs OCR on all pages to make them searchable. The OcrPages() method recognizes text at 300 DPI using Nutrient’s built-in OCR engine (125+ languages) with advanced pre- and post-processing. No extra products are needed.

    Example 4 — Merge multiple PDFs

    IronPDF approach

    using IronPdf;
    var html_a = @"<p> [PDF_A] </p>
    <p> [PDF_A] 1st Page </p>
    <div style = 'page-break-after: always;' ></div>
    <p> [PDF_A] 2nd Page</p>";
    var html_b = @"<p> [PDF_B] </p>
    <p> [PDF_B] 1st Page </p>
    <div style = 'page-break-after: always;' ></div>
    <p> [PDF_B] 2nd Page</p>";
    var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
    var pdfdoc_a = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html_a);
    var pdfdoc_b = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html_b);
    var merged = PdfDocument.Merge(pdfdoc_a, pdfdoc_b);
    merged.SaveAs("Merged.pdf");

    IronPDF generates PDFs from HTML strings and then combines them using the Merge() method.

    Nutrient .NET SDK approach

    using GdPictureDocumentConverter gdpictureConverter = new GdPictureDocumentConverter();
    IEnumerable<string> source = new List<string>(new string[] { @"C:\temp\source1.jpg", @"C:\temp\source2.xlsx" });
    gdpictureConverter.CombineToPDF(source, @"C:\temp\output.pdf", PdfConformance.PDF1_5);

    Nutrient’s CombineToPDF() accepts mixed file types (here, a JPG and Excel file) and converts them to PDF while merging. The method handles 100+ file formats — Office documents, images, and CAD files. IronPDF only merges existing PDFs.

    PDF/A conversion benchmark

    In an independent benchmark (November 2025) converting 3,157 files per vendor to PDF/A, Nutrient significantly outperformed IronPDF on conformance and reliability, while IronPDF was faster on raw throughput.

    PDF/A conformance

    MetricNutrientIronPDF
    PDF/A conformance rate92.1 percent41.1 percent

    IronPDF’s high raw success rate (99.3 percent) masks the fact that most converted files do not meet strict PDF/A conformance. Nutrient produces valid, standards-compliant output at more than double the rate.

    Reliability

    MetricNutrientIronPDF
    Conversion success rate96.3 percent99.3 percent
    Critical failures011
    Bottlenecks (>1 minute)70

    IronPDF had 11 critical failures (unrecoverable errors like stack overflows or memory corruption) across 3,157 files. Nutrient had zero.

    Performance and efficiency

    MetricNutrientIronPDF
    Throughput (files per minute)492.7699.6
    Processing time (minutes)6.174.48
    Average output size (MB)1.082.10
    Average memory (MB)7,456832

    IronPDF is faster and uses less memory. Nutrient produces files nearly half the size. The slower processing results from additional validation and repair steps that raise conformance rates.

    PDF/UA conversion benchmark

    In a separate benchmark (November 2025) converting 3,157 files per vendor to PDF/UA, Nutrient was the only vendor that completed an unassisted end-to-end run over all files. Other SDKs required manual intervention to skip problematic files.

    PDF/UA conformance

    MetricNutrientIronPDF
    PDF/UA conformance rate83.9 percent47.9 percent

    Nutrient produces accessible, standards-compliant PDF/UA output at nearly double the rate, with full structural tagging, semantic role inference, and reading order detection.

    Reliability

    MetricNutrientIronPDF
    Conversion success rate96.3 percent98.5 percent
    Critical failures027

    IronPDF had 27 critical failures across 3,157 files. Nutrient had zero.

    Performance and efficiency

    MetricNutrientIronPDF
    Throughput (files per minute)27.691.9
    Average output size (MB)1.161.85

    IronPDF is faster for PDF/UA conversion. Nutrient’s slower throughput results from full structural tagging, contrast checks, and table and list heading analysis, which produce smaller, higher-conformance output.

    Note — Benchmark results vary by document complexity, hardware, and environment. Test with your actual documents for production planning.

    Pricing comparison

    Compare licensing costs, bundled features, and when each library offers better value for your team.

    IronPDF pricing

    Commercial licensing

    • Commercial licenses typically range from approximately $750 to $2,000 or more depending on team size and project scope
    • Perpetual licenses available (one-time purchase) or annual subscriptions
    • Redistribution requires additional fees for SaaS and OEM deployment
    • Updates and support included with subscription plans

    Bundle pricing

    IronPDF is part of Iron Software Suite. If you need multiple capabilities (OCR, barcode processing, and more), you’ll need additional Iron Software products, which can be purchased as a bundle.

    Nutrient .NET SDK pricing

    Commercial licensing

    • Contact Sales for a custom quote
    • Enterprise support included
    • No per-developer or per-project restrictions
    • Flexible licensing models available
    • All features included in base license (OCR, ML-powered extraction, 100+ formats)
    • Optional AI Document Processing SDK available

    Nutrient’s price covers OCR, format conversion, ML-powered data extraction, and compliance. With Iron Software, these capabilities require buying multiple products.

    Total cost of ownership comparison

    FactorIronPDFNutrient .NET SDK
    Initial costStarts around $750 or moreContact for pricing
    Additional libraries neededIronOCR for OCR, converters for other formatsAll-in-one solution
    SupportCommercial support includedEnterprise support included
    UpdatesAnnual subscriptionCommercial updates and patches
    CompliancePDF/A, PDF/UA supportedComplete (PDF/A, PDF/UA, signatures)
    TrainingGood documentationComprehensive documentation
    MaintenanceVendor-supportedVendor-supported

    When IronPDF costs less

    • Your primary need is HTML-to-PDF conversion
    • You have a small team (one or two developers)
    • You don’t require OCR or multi-format processing
    • Your documents are primarily web-based content

    When Nutrient provides better value

    • You need OCR or document extraction
    • You process multiple document formats
    • ML-powered data extraction saves development time
    • Compliance requirements are critical
    • Enterprise support reduces risk

    Migration guide — IronPDF to Nutrient

    Migrating from IronPDF to Nutrient takes a few steps, whether you replace HTML conversion entirely or adopt a hybrid approach.

    Step 1 — Install Nutrient .NET SDK

    Install via NuGet and configure licensing:

    Terminal window
    # Add the package (.NET 8.0 or higher).
    dotnet add package GdPicture.API
    # For .NET Framework 4.6.2:
    dotnet add package GdPicture
    using GdPicture14;
    LicenseManager licenseManager = new LicenseManager();
    licenseManager.RegisterKEY(""); // Empty string for trial mode

    Step 2 — Choose your migration approach

    Direct replacement — Replace IronPDF’s ChromePdfRenderer with Nutrient’s GdPictureDocumentConverter (see example 1)

    Hybrid approach — Keep IronPDF for HTML generation, and use Nutrient for OCR, extraction, and compliance

    Programmatic generation — Use Nutrient’s PDF creation API for simple documents

    Step 3 — Add document processing features

    After migrating HTML-to-PDF conversion, add these Nutrient capabilities:

    Migration effort estimate

    Project complexityEstimated effortKey challenges
    Simple HTML-to-PDF conversion (fewer than 10 templates)2–4 weeksHTML rendering conversion, testing
    Medium complexity (10–50 templates)1–3 monthsComplex HTML layouts, feature parity
    Large application (50+ templates)3–6 monthsRefactoring, integration, and testing

    Both libraries use Chrome-based rendering for HTML-to-PDF conversion. The main migration effort is adapting API patterns and testing output fidelity with your specific HTML layouts.

    Use case recommendations

    ScenarioChoose IronPDF when…Choose Nutrient when…
    Primary use caseHTML-to-PDF conversion and basic PDF manipulation cover your needs (web content, reports, forms, and signatures)Also need OCR, ML-powered data extraction, multi-format support, scanning, or barcodes
    Document typesOnly generating new PDFs from HTML and CSS layoutsProcessing existing PDFs, scanned documents, or 100+ formats (Office, CAD, and DICOM)
    OCR and scanningDon’t need OCR or scanner integrationProcess scanned documents with built-in OCR or capture from scanners (TWAIN and WIA)
    Data extractionDon’t need automated data extractionNeed ML-powered extraction from forms and invoices (key-value pairs, tables, OMR, and MRZ)
    ComplianceDon’t need PDF/A archival or PDF/UA accessibilityRequire PDF/A compliance or PDF/UA accessibility for regulated industries
    Team size and licensingSmall team (one to five developers) with clear HTML-to-PDF scope and simple licensing needsGrowing requirements or need to avoid adding separate libraries for OCR, extraction, and compliance
    Compliance benchmarksPDF/A and PDF/UA conformance not critical for your workflowNeed high PDF/A (92.1 percent) or PDF/UA (83.9 percent) conformance rates for regulated industries

    Hybrid approach — Some teams use IronPDF for HTML-to-PDF generation, and then load PDFs into Nutrient for OCR, extraction, and compliance. Both use Chrome-based rendering, so the main reason for a hybrid setup is preserving existing IronPDF code while adding Nutrient’s processing capabilities. This requires managing two SDKs.

    Conclusion

    IronPDF handles HTML-to-PDF conversion and basic PDF manipulation. Nutrient provides HTML-to-PDF conversion and full document processing — OCR, data extraction, multi-format support, and compliance — in a single SDK.

    Try Nutrient free or contact Sales for pricing.

    FAQ

    Which library should I choose if I need to process scanned documents or extract data from PDFs?

    Choose Nutrient for document processing. It has built-in OCR (125+ languages), ML-powered data extraction from forms and invoices, and image preprocessing in one SDK. IronPDF offers basic PDF manipulation but needs separate products (IronOCR) for OCR, resulting in additional costs and more integration work.

    Can I start with IronPDF and add Nutrient later if needed?

    Yes. Nutrient can open and process PDFs generated by IronPDF. But you’ll manage two libraries, licenses, and codebases. Most teams test whether Nutrient’s Chrome-based HTML-to-PDF conversion works for them first. If it does, starting with Nutrient avoids maintaining two PDF libraries and lets you add OCR, extraction, or compliance features later without rewriting code.

    What if I need to deploy to Docker and cloud environments?

    Both libraries run on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Both use Chrome-based rendering for HTML-to-PDF conversion, so Docker image sizes are comparable when using that feature. For workflows that don’t need HTML-to-PDF (OCR, extraction, and format conversion), Nutrient can run without a browser dependency, reducing image size and configuration overhead.

    How do total costs compare when I need OCR capabilities?

    With IronPDF, you need two separate products: IronPDF plus IronOCR (each with separate licenses and costs). Nutrient includes built-in OCR, image preprocessing, format conversion, and compliance features in the base license. For teams needing OCR or data extraction, Nutrient’s single-license model costs less overall and avoids managing multiple vendors.

    What AI capabilities does Nutrient offer?

    Nutrient .NET SDK includes ML-powered data extraction for key-value pairs, tables, and form fields, all built into the base product. For advanced natural language extraction and document classification using LLMs, Nutrient offers the AI Document Processing SDK as a separate product with its own license.

    Which is easier to learn for .NET developers?

    IronPDF uses an object-oriented API with .NET patterns (ChromePdfRenderer, PdfDocument). The HTML-to-PDF workflow: Render HTML string or URL, and then save as a PDF. Nutrient uses a method-based approach with status codes and page management. IronPDF is simpler for HTML-to-PDF conversion. Nutrient takes more setup but includes documentation and commercial support. For HTML-to-PDF only, IronPDF is faster to learn. For document processing (OCR, extraction, and compliance), Nutrient’s single API beats managing multiple libraries.

    Hulya Masharipov

    Hulya Masharipov

    Technical Writer

    Hulya is a frontend web developer and technical writer who enjoys creating responsive, scalable, and maintainable web experiences. She’s passionate about open source, web accessibility, cybersecurity privacy, and blockchain.

    Explore related topics

    Try for free Ready to get started?